Organizing your DNA matches helps you make sense of them. From someone who organizes DNA results for a living, here’s the fastest, easiest way to organize them, whether you’ve tested at AncestryDNA, 23andMe or another company.
When I was a kid I collected books. I spent hours categorizing and alphabetizing them. My favorite was The Berenstein Bears and the Messy Room. The final page, showing Brother and Sister Bear’s closet full of neatly labeled and stacked boxes, was literally a dream for me. I love organization. So naturally, I want a way to organize my vast new collection of DNA cousins.
Quick tip for organizing your DNA matches
The very best and very easiest thing you can do that will lead to fewer repeated searches and thus a more productive session with your genetic genealogy test results, is to simply use the notes field provided by each testing company. The notes field at Family Tree DNA and MyHeritage are accessible right from the main match page, while at AncestryDNA and 23andMe you have to first click on your match to edit your notes. Here’s where to find the note field from within a match page at AncestryDNA:
At AncestryDNA, once you’ve created a note within a match, you can view it from the main match page.
What should you write in these notes? Your known or suspected connecting ancestor. At the very least, say which side of the family they are on, if known. Record the date you contacted them, and if they responded. (23andMe makes this easy by showing you all of your correspondence with that person right there on the page. At Ancestry you can click on the link in the upper right corner of the match page to see your previous messages.)
The AncestryDNA dot system
In the image above showing where to add a note, did you notice that “Add to group” option? This is a more advanced way of labeling your DNA matches in groups of people who are all related to each other, or genetic networks. Here’s how to do that:
Chatting with your DNA matches
There is no question that corresponding with your matches is a huge part of this genetic genealogy process. While many may not respond for a variety of reasons, many do, and you need to keep track of that correspondence. One idea is to move your correspondence as soon as possible away from the constraints of the testing company’s email service. Create a separate email address just for your DNA correspondence and direct all of your matches to talk to you there. Use the folders and tags within your email program to help you quickly find a desired correspondence.
I would also encourage you to copy the key points of correspondence into a Word document. I know oftentimes I get an email with a lot of information, but there are only a few points I want to focus on. Instead of needing to read through a long email each time I am looking for information about a particular ancestor, I can just turn to my Word document and find just the information I need, often saving time and frustration.
Whatever your system, just stick to it and you will feel less overwhelmed at the prospect of keeping track of your thousands of cousins.
We’re here to help!
Like many things, getting started with organizing and contacting your DNA matches is easier said than done. That’s why we’re here, we have the resources and support you need for every step of your DNA discovery journey. We’ve put together all of our best tips for contacting matches into one free guide. Grab your copy and start connecting with your DNA matches!
The "add a note" feature seems to have disappeared. How do I get to it?
I can still see that feature. Are you first clicking on the name of your match in the main DNA match page?
One set of great great grandparents are cousins. They were born on Nantucket Island and I’m sure there is a load of endogamy going on. How would you label them? Do I just proceed as I would with my other gggrandparents?
Sandy, dealing with endogamy is tricky. You will just end up having one label for that entire line.
Great video. A couple of questions. Is there a reason you picked 3x GG? Was it because it was the level that was complete or for another reason? If you use 3xGG couples to form major groupings, how do you group predecessor couples, like 4xGG or 5xGG? Are they colored or do you feel those connections are too tenuous? Also, as far as I can see, Ancestry has set colors, not the gradients you used? How do you put in custom colors and where do you get gradients? Thanks so much.
Arelene thanks for reading. I draw the line at 3X greats because I feel that is about the limit where autosomal DNA testing can reach. It just gets really really complicated if we try to go back further. The colors I used are the same colors available at Ancestry. No custom colors are available.
When you say "all related to each other" do you mean all have a common ancestor? I agree shared matches on 23andme and MyHeretage share the same piece of DNA in my experience but on a Ancestry a shared match just means they are on both peoples list of matches so don’t all necessarily all have a common ancestor or are all related to the same family. Which means you cant use the dot system to add all shared matches to one set of 3GGG – have I got this right?
Hi Nick. Actually, shared matches at 23andMe, MyHeritage, and Ancestry all work the same way. It is just three people who all appear on each other’s match lists. They don’t all three have to share the same segment of DNA. In fact, we wouldn’t expect all groups of three to share the exact same piece of DNA. So while it isn’t always true that those three people share the same 3X great grandparent, that is the hypothesis we are going to start our analysis with. Then adjust later as we do genealogy.
I agree the dot system is a really useful tool and have started using it. You also recommend assigning dots to ancestors using AncestryDNA’s Thru-lines. However in my limited experience I find thru-lines can be misleading since it is not based solely on DNA. Any comment?
I agree. Thru lines uses an algorithm based on trees, not DNA at all. If a lot of people have copied the wrong ancestors into their trees – which Thru lines encourages! – then it is a self-fulfilling prophecy that their DNA matches appear to support that incorrect ancestral line. This gets worse and worse as more people copy the wrong ancestors. I think Thru lines can give a very nice picture AFTER the diligent work to get correct genealogy from original sources has been done – no copying allowed!
David and Lesley. Yes, ThruLines can be misleading. It is only as good as the trees it is using. But you can verify your genetic vs genealogy relationship with these ThruLines matches to give yourself confidence in the connection. Essentially, you are asking yourself, "How much DNA should I share with this person if this is our relationship?" If that works out, you should be able to use that match to help you find other matches who are related to you in a similar way. So even if the ancestor’s name is incorrect, the DNA will still help you gather matches related to that line, and then you can DO GENEALOGY to help you figure out the correct name.
I thought the dots at Ancestry should be an easy thing to use, until I tried actually doing it myself. Should I dot all this person’s matches and then theirs inside that or what? I was just dotting and not examining who I was using to do it with or why. Now, finally, I am understanding, and am able to sort my matches into their true groups and not some mish-mash pile. It does make a difference who you use when you want to do certain things. So thankful for her book!
Robin! Thanks for sharing your experience! Most people end up redoing their dots after they realize there is a best way to do them. I am glad you are making progress!
Diahan, I’m sure I’m missing something simple here. In your presentation you show starting assigning groups with your grandparents. Later you show that you have assigned groups to your 3X Grandparents. That would be 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 = 30 groups. But Ancestry only supports 24 groups. What am I missing?
Excellent math skills! You are correct. It won’t work if you do that. I usually skip the grandparents generation for most people, since they do want to get back to their 3X greats. But for others who are not looking that far back, labeling grandparents might be helpful. I think it is important to view the dots as flexible, to be used to help you with a particular research goal, instead of a way of categorizing everyone on your DNA match list.
Hi Diahan! Love your style! However, I’m stuck on making sense of the ThruLines rationale presented in your DOT system video. You and "MJ" appear to have a MRCA of "Nathan F. Ashcroft", the son of Elizabeth Hazelwood (who is the daughter of the person that ThruLines has identified as your "common ancestor" (Thomas Hazelwood). It appears that Nathan, and his wife, should be your ThruLines "Common Ancestors".
I’m guessing that Thrulines has not identified "Nathan" as the MRCA because at this stage he is only a hint (green instead of blue or pink).
If/when you add "Nathan" to the tree so he is no longer just a hint, wouldn’t the ThruLine change and make Nathan your common ancestor with MJ?
It is tricky to see in the way the image is cut off. Elizabeth is not my ancestor, she is my ancestor’s sister. So my MRCA with MJ is Thomas Haselwood+Francis Dance, not with Nathan or Elizabeth.
But if it WAS, you would be right.
Got it. It’s the horizontal line between Thomas & Elizabeth that connects your branch to Thomas, not Nathan. Many Thanks!
Thanks for your blog and videos! I’ve already used the Ancestry color dots in a different way. However I am the administrator for my cousin’s DNA kit, so I thought I’d try your system on his matches. Since I’m not interested in his father’s relatives, there is no reason to color code them, is there? I’m really most interested in our 3rd and 4th great grandparents.
Right, you can focus your coloring on the maternal line. Though if you have a first cousin on the paternal side, it doesn’t hurt to dot them. That way you can just be sure your family does not have endogamy that might throw you off.
How do I clear out my COLOR DOTS?
How do I assign a color to parent 1/parent 2?
This article teaches how to remove your dots on Ancestry And this page has a tutorial for how to add dots to parents/ grandparents/ etc.
Hi there Diahan, My Grt Grt Grandfather was a convict and lived in Bunbury Western Australia. He had Aliases, one being John Buchanan but married and died in the name of Thomas Mainwaring with Thomas Mainwaring noted as his Father. (and no record of where born etc just trialled at Warwickshire England) i searched so many Thomas Mainwarings and John Buchanans to no avail as don’t have any details to know if it is him, the thing is my paternal shows 38% Welsh on my Father’s side and 14%made up of Scottish, English etc and 44% my Mum’s side which is correct. When i search the DNA matches on my Paternal side show the name Mainwaring, only my brother who took the test for me & most of Buchanans are not connected to Grt Grt Grandfather line but those that maybe but not too sure are private trees and i don’t think the name is Welsh, My Mainwaring surname is pronounced the Welsh way not the British way of Mannering for Mainwaring, i guess Mainwaring is an Alias name too or what other explanation would there be if the surname Mainwaring does not show up at all up on my brother’s Paternal DNA matches of 9,141 or mine, Ancestry said more chance of my brother doing a test as my Mum & Dad have passed and my Uncle (dad’s brother) ill not do a test. Thank you for your time Dianah. Kind regards Kim Mainwaring
Is this ancestor a direct male line ancestor? If yes, then I would recommend having your brother do a YDNA test. For surname questions, a YDNA test is a really good option to weed out surname changes throughout the generations. If this ancestor is not a direct male line ancestor, then I would recommend finding a direct male-line descendant of the ancestor and seeing if they would be willing to take a YDNA test.
Is there an easy way to add a lot of people to a single group? Doing them one by one takes a lot of time.
I have tried using the dot groups but with 41,000 matches, it is an overwhelming task. There doesn’t seem to be a way (on Ancestry) to select all of the matches at once to apply a dot. Doing them one at a time will take forever.
Hi Ronald – If you use the Google Chrome web browser, they have an extension you can enable that will let you check all the boxes.
Go to this website: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/click-all-checkboxes/fhlogpdbadmjfpndmaijnibflgnbnhof?hl=en-US
Click on the Add to Chrome button, then “Add Extension”
Once the extension has been added, it will show up on the top right corner of your webpage as a puzzle piece icon.
Go to AncestryDNA to your match list. Select the match you want to work with, and go to their profile page. Click on the Shared Matches tab to see who you both share DNA with.
Scroll all the way to the bottom. If it loads more at the bottom when you get there, scroll down some more. Repeat this until you are really at the bottom of your shared matches and no others load onto the page.
On the last shared match at the bottom, click on the + on the right hand side to add to a group, but don’t add it anywhere yet.
Now we’re going to click on that puzzle piece icon at the very top, then click on “Click all checkboxes.”
A new popup will appear in bold, blue letters that says “CLICK ALL CHECKBOXES.” Click on that.
All the checkboxes on the page should be selected now EXCEPT for the match at the bottom that you originally selected. Make sure to manually recheck that box. You will also need to de-select all the match group boxes on the right hand side except for the group/dot that you are trying to add all the matches into.
You also don’t need to dot all your matches – if you’re feeling overwhelmed, just focus on one research question and dot the matches that will help you answer that question! Hope that helps!
I am trying this, but it is not working. I check the plus sign on the right side of the match, and when I click on “CLICK ALL CHECKBOXES” it only checks the box on the left side of that one match, not all the matches.
What am I doing wrong?
Hi from New Zealand,
I am managing the DNA results for a friend whose father was born in Auckland, New Zealand in 1915. His birth certificate was sealed, as was done about then, but we have been able to glean some information from the Government department since. The results show his mother’s name, her age and where she was born. We were told that some details had been deleted. No details about the father. The boy was adopted aged 4 and the adoptive mother said that no one would find out the birth parents! This made me think that it was the adoptive father being the birth father. However neither the adoptive name or the mother’s name appear on my friends DNA results. The closest DNA result is 461cms, another name entirely, so I have been following his family but can’t find a connection to either of the birth parents.or adoptive parents.
Hoping that you can help!
We can definitely help! I recommend checking out this free guide!
Love the dots – so helpful!
I have a few instances in my tree where people married more than once and had children from these multiple marriages. When I look at Thrulines for my 3xG grandfather, the DNA matches I see include some from his marriage to my 3xG grandmother, and some from his other wives.
My question is – if my dots represent MY ancestral couples, then I shouldn’t be putting ALL my matches in the group – is that correct? I should only include those DNA matches that come from MY ancestral couple, correct?
If I do that, then I’m potentially missing DNA matches that I share only with my 3xG grandfather, not my 3xG grandmother.
Or should I be including ALL my DNA matches from both my 3xG grandparents, regardless of the couples?
Thanks!
Teresa
For cases of half-relationships like what you’re describing you can give each “half” line its own color, so a different color for each spouse of your ancestor/ descendants of that spouse.
I seem to be slightly confused as to how to start the labeling process. I know none of the DNA matches on the paternal side.
How do you determine who should be your first group? Do you just do the first person on your match list? Is your 2nd group the 2nd person on your match list?
This video has a tutorial on how to use the Dot system!